Government funding for cycling announced

Today the Government announced more cash to improve cycling.  Welcome though this extra investment is for cycling, it smacks of being an afterthought and is only for some places in the UK.  Where is the long term vision and overall policy for improvement across the country?  Governments and local councils could then tailor funding to the strategy year on year.  Why not switch the huge amount being invested in building new roads and widening motorways into cycling UK wide?  The Government seems to be big on gestures but small on long term strategies.

On a local note there is funding for Bristol, so if this is paid through the West of England Transport Board there could be some for Bath and North east Somerset.  However, even here we have no long term strategy yet.

A number of English cities and national parks are to share a £94m cash injection to promote cycling. Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham, Newcastle, Bristol, Cambridge, Oxford and Norwich will share £77m, with four national parks getting a further £17m. The money is to improve existing and fund new cycle routes. The government says it also wants to cut red tape to facilitate cyclist-friendly planning. Labour said roads had become less safe for cyclists under this government. Prime Minister David Cameron said he wanted to start “a cycling revolution”.
“Following our success in the Olympics, the Paralympics and the Tour de France, British cycling is riding high – now we want to see cycling soar,” he said. “This government wants to make it easier and safer for people who already cycle as well as encouraging far more people to take it up and business, local government, developers, road users and the transport sector all have a role to play in helping to achieve this.”

Manchester alone will get £20m to build or improve some 30 miles of cycle paths and create new 20mph speed limit zones around the city.  The national parks to benefit are the New Forest, Peak District, South Downs and Dartmoor.  Major improvements to 93 miles of cycle routes on Dartmoor are anticipated.

The government has also announced a feasibility study to look at creating a new national cycleway broadly following the route of the HS2 rail line from London to Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester.

Ministers hope to emulate nationwide the popularity of cycling in London – where the number of cyclists has doubled over the past 10 years, according to one estimate.

“But pedal outside the city and the picture’s very different,” said BBC transport correspondent Richard Westcott. “Far more people prefer to drive, walk or catch the bus – in fact government statistics show that in 2012, just 2% of journeys in Britain were by bike.”

Malcolm Shepherd, chief executive of sustainable transport charity Sustrans, welcomed the initiative.

He said: “This is fantastic news for those living in the successful cities.

“Getting about by bike for everyday journeys could become a reality for people of all ages and abilities in those areas.

“We welcome the recognition that for the cycling revolution to become a way of life for us all this level of investment must be maintained and extended to all parts of the UK, including rural areas.”

But shadow transport secretary Maria Eagle said: “No amount of cynical spin from David Cameron will make up for the fact that, immediately on taking office, he axed Cycle England, the Cycle Demonstration Towns scheme and the annual £60m budget to support cycling that he inherited.  “Since then he has axed targets to reduce deaths and serious injuries on our roads, reduced traffic enforcement, cut the THINK! awareness campaign and allowed longer HGVs.

“Only last month the prime minister set out plans for Britain’s roads that failed to include a single commitment to the investment in separated cycling infrastructure that is the best way to boost cycling and make it safer.”

She said Labour would, using the existing roads budget, deliver “long-term support for separated safe cycling routes and safer junctions”.  “Tragically the number of cyclist deaths are now at a five-year high, reversing the progress that was starting to be made, and reports of new casualties are becoming a weekly occurrence,” she said.

Posted in Cycling policy and politics | Leave a comment

20 mph Speed Limits

Three months ago I wrote an article for the Local Government Association’s weekly magazine “First” in a section called “Last Word”, about 20 mph speed limits.  Implementing 20 mph speed limits is one of the 10 commitments in the Times Safer Cycling campaign and the speed limits are being rolled out across Bath and North East Somerset Council’s area.  The article is reproduced below:

As I look out of my window I can see three little girls riding their bikes in my street. A common occurrence here, where people in this quiet residential street are aware of children playing and are careful, but in other streets this is pretty unusual. In the past most children liked to play out close to home, but it is now more likely they will be kept indoors to play, because of the danger of speeding traffic going past.

Across the country 44 councils so far, have decided to implement “signs only” 20 mph speed limits. The usual justification for this move is to make

20 is Plentyour residential roads safer. The Transport Research Laboratory found that approximately 98% of pedestrians will survive a 20mph collision. Their chances drop to around 93% at 30mph and 69% at 40mph.

However, putting in 20 mph speed limits in residential streets means more than just making streets safer. It is the beginning of a culture change where people on foot and on bikes, and children playing, take precedence over passing motor vehicles. It’s about giving control of streets back to the people who live in them.

Councils can do signs only “blanket” coverage for a fraction of the cost of 20mph zones, where there are physical measures such as speed tables, to prevent drivers from breaking the law. 20 mph zones, with restraints still have their place but with reducing funds less of them can be implemented by Councils.

Critics say that “signs only” 20 mph speed limits cannot be enforced, but then enforcement of any speed limit is difficult given reducing police resources, but that is not the point. If councils achieve a small reduction in speed it has a big affect on safety. Signs only 20 mph should be self enforcing by drivers, by becoming the default speed limit and exceeding it should become as rare as the non wearing of seat belts.

Government advice now encourages Traffic Authorities to consider 20mph restrictions not just in residential areas, but also on busier roads where the numbers of pedestrians and cyclists are—or could be—significant. A sure sign of a growing move to 20 mph.

 

Posted in Roger's opinions | 5 Comments

Welcome to my new website

Hello. I’m Roger Symonds and this is my new cycling blog.

Posted in Roger's opinions | 6 Comments