Bike Contra Flows on one way streets

When I mention contraflows to non cyclists in the UK, I often get comments such as “that’s very dangerous” or “why do anything so silly”. In a country where highways engineers’ first thoughts on traffic control are barriers and traffic lights, there seems to be a reluctance to make any sort of change in terms of our road use. Automatic rejection seems to be the default position for suggested change. Even though contraflows are ever present in continental Europe, with the red circle/horizontal white line no entry sign and “except bicycles” written underneath the sign, bicycle contraflows are rare in the UK.

Cycle Contraflow in The Avenue

Cycle Contraflow in The Avenue, Combe Down

So why don’t we have more contraflows and adopt these signs here in the UK? Well we do in some places, but they are by no means widespread. In my opinion many more one way streets could have contra flows. Bike riding is used by many people as a way of getting close to where they want to go by the shortest possible route. If we want to encourage more people to use bikes as a means of everyday transport, we have to bear these two issues in mind and provide for them where we can. There are many more cycle stands around in most cities now, so that people can lock their bikes close to their destination. No searching for a parking space costing at least £1 per hour! However in many areas people riding bikes are still expected to follow tortuous round the houses one way systems designed for motor vehicles.

Cycle Contraflow on The Firs Combe Down

Cycle Contraflow on The Firs, Combe Down

A few years ago Cllr Cherry Beath and myself spent some of our local issues money on two contra flows for people riding bikes, one in The Avenue and the other in The Firs. All that was needed was a few signs and some coloured paint on the road at each end of the contra flows. These local village roads are not very busy. The contra flows were cheap and easy to implement. They fitted well with our efforts to slow Combe Down Traffic (when drivers see a bike approaching them from the opposite direction they tend to slow down), remove the need to ride on pavements and provide a more direct route around Combe Down for people on bikes. The contra flows have been working well.

Through the West of England Partnership the Council won a bid for money to put in contra flows in the Seven Dials area of Bath, where there is already a contraflow though Cheap Street and Westgate Street. Contraflows can also be seen in James Street West, along by the City of Bath College and at the bottom of Wellsway next to the Devonshire Arms.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New Bike Hire Scheme for Bath

Soon to be seen in Bath

Soon to be seen in Bath

Many people are familiar with the old bike hire scheme in Bath with its four sets of docking stations in the centre of Bath.  This scheme was funded for one year through the European Civitas project and has now ended.

There was much wrong with that scheme.  Firstly it was not very clear about how the bikes could be used (a card had to be used and this was available on line or at the Tourist Information shop in Abbey Churchyard), secondly there were only four docking locations in the city.
Bicincitta were managing the scheme from Italy, so when anything went wrong, and it did frequently, there was often a wait before it was put right. However, a bike hire scheme run by Nextbike (see the company link here) will be launched in early May. 

There will be 10 docking locations this time.  The four existing locations will remain (with different equipment), Guildhall, Holburne Museum, Green Park Station and Bath Spa Station.  In addition there will be new docking stations at the RUH, Bath Spa University, the Marina/Caravan Park near the New bridge Park and Ride, Unite Student Housing on Lower Bristol Road, in Oldfield Park at the junction of Moorland Road and Triangle West and if approved by English Heritage in Royal Avenue in Victoria Park.

Docking stations will be replaced by "Nextbike" equipment

Docking stations will be replaced by “Nextbike” equipment

Bikes in the new bike hire scheme can be hired at the locations by an App or by telephone to a hot line and the first half hour will be free. this si all you need – no having to go to the Tourist Information Centre to get a card.  The bikes can be taken out of the city too – under the previous scheme this was not allowed – so a gentle ride up through the Two Tunnels to Midford or along the canal to Bathampton should be attractive to visitors, but they may also be used by commuters at Newbridge Park and Ride.

Bath Spa university students are also being targeted by docking stations at student accommodation on Lower Bristol Road and at the University. Most cities with such a bike hire scheme are bigger than Bath, but we get more than 4 million visitors each year coming to the city, so there is a good chance that the bikes will make money for the operator Nextbike.

The Council has committed £25k from the Government’s Local sustainable Transport fund to help kick start the new scheme. The company, Nextbike was established in Leipzig. Nextbike bikes are available around the clock at rental stations.

Once registered, renting bikes can be done in every participating city and country. Nextbike provides bike sharing systems in more than 30 German cities and 14 countries worldwide. This way, a user doesn’t need to register a new account each time in a new city. Visitors from cities in Europe, where Nextbike operate and who are registered will find it easy to rent a bike in Bath once they are installed.

Posted in Cycling around Bath | 2 Comments

Bike Power gains changes on London Road

Roger on London Road at the cycleway where it is planned to have seven car parking spaces

Roger on London Road at the cycleway where it is planned to have seven car parking spaces

Cyclists were mobilised by the prospect of the London Road “Gateway” scheme of environmental improvements making conditions for people riding bikes worse.  Following a submission by Roger Houghton showing a segregated two way cycle lane on the inward bound carriageway the Council have come up with a scheme that does not entirely meet all the cyclists aims, but goes some way towards improving conditions in London Road for people riding bikes.

The favoured proposal that was put to cyclists earlier this week has the present cycleway retained and improved and an on road unsegregated cycleway from Morrisons to the eastern end of the present segregated path.  There will also be an on road cycle lane on part of the northern side of the highway.

At the time of writing the on road cycle lanes will be “advisory”, but they should be enforceable by Traffic Orders. Otherwise there is no incentive for vehicles not to park on them, nor to keep them free, when on the move.  I believe that the cycle lanes will have coloured Tarmac – a first for the city.

It is disappointing that Roger Houghton’s scheme cannot be entirely implemented because of Highways Officers insistence on a 6.75 metre carriageway.  This is deemed necessary for resurfacing and in case there is an accident, which requires the extra width.  I would have thought that this could have been done by having removable bollards separating the cycle lane from the vehicle lane.

However, what is certain is that there would have been no improvement for cyclists without the vigilance of local cycle advocates and without the 1300 person petition that triggered a council debate.

A success for Bike Power!

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Cycling around Bath | 4 Comments

Make our roads safe for cyclists

London Road

London Road

The petition about the worsening of cycling on the London Road has now passed 1200 and will be debated at Council on Tuesday 18th February.  However cycling representatives took the opportunity to present to Cabinet on Wednesday 12th February.  I also made a presentation to Cabinet in more general terms about cycling issues on our roads.  You can read this presentation below:

This administration has done much to promote off road cycling – support for Two Tunnels, the Odd Down circuit, Batheaston bridge, but if for instance the soon to be implemented “on street” hire bikes are to be successful our streets must be made more cycle friendly.
It is in “on street” facilities that investment is needed.  It is not enough to point to money invested in off road routes and ignore the dangers to people riding bikes on our roads every day.
The London Road issue is just one of the areas where the safety of people riding bikes is very poor.  I will not repeat what has already been said, but I hope the cabinet will look closely at the options put forward by officers and choose the one that is best for safety of cyclists. My own preference is not on the list, but would be for a bus lane all the way in from the Batheaston roundabout to the Cleveland Bridge.
The potential increase in journeys by bike in Bath is through general riding into and out of the city every day and that is mostly on our roads.  I note too that Sustrans are looking at routes and links across the council area.  Many of the improvements that Sustrans will recommend will be on road.
If we are to make streets safer for people on bikes it is inevitable that space will have to be taken from motor vehicles.  The Cabinet must not shy away from this.  For the long term benefits of reduction in pollution and congestion, better health and addressing climate change, they must be brave enough to reallocate road space.  It is no longer acceptable to put “traffic flow” as the top priority.

In the 2014/15 budget we propose to spend nearly £10m on roads and in addition this year an extra £2m, so road repair and maintenance could be said to indirectly affect cycling, yet none of this goes into cycling infrastructure such as advance stop lines, protected (or even unprotected) cycle lanes and there is no reallocation of road space to cyclists.  People on bikes are expected to mix it with motor vehicles or get off their bikes.

I will leave you with a quote from an architect who has worked on cycling strategies in Continental Europe, London and New York.

Jan Gehl, writing in cycling weekly said:
“In the UK the focus on smoothing traffic flows has left everyone else at the margins.”

It is time that people riding bikes were brought in from the margins.

Posted in Cycling around Bath | Leave a comment

Bath Cycle Death

This is my first post for over a month because I fell off my bike and broke my hip.  I am now recovering at home, but won’t be riding until at least the new year.  There was no-one else involved in my crash.

Ghost Bike at Midland Bridge Road

Ghost Bike at Midland Bridge Road

Last week Jake Gilmore was killed in Midland Bridge Road when riding home from work in a hit and run crash. There will be a respectful ride next Saturday 30th November starting in Kingsmead Square at 10am, with a minutes silence in Midland Bridge Road where flowers can be left and candles lit.

Much has been written in the Chronicle this week about the problems faced by cyclists.  I was asked, among others interested in cycling, to make a contribution to the paper.  Part of what I had to say is reproduced below:

There is a need for space to be allocated to people who ride bikes, but we should all work towards a new understanding of the issues and problems that road users face, with much more consideration given to people walking and cycling who are the most vulnerable.

Educating everyone to recognise that all users have rights and responsibilities when using the roads is necessary, such as being vigilant and not being distracted by an iPod or talking on a mobile phone. Tolerance, awareness, concentration and understanding should be ingrained in all, rather than impatience, anger and intolerance, as is often the case.

Posted in Cycling around Bath | Leave a comment

Chew Valley Lake Cycle Path

Lovely view across the Lake from the Sailing Club

Lovely view across the Lake from the Sailing Club

You could be excused if you thought that it would be easy to ride or walk all the way around the Chew Valley Lake, but you would be mistaken.  This beautiful “man made” reservoir in the heart of the Valley, close to Chew Magna and Chew Stoke should be a prime tourist attraction.  To a certain extent it is, provided you don’t want to walk or cycle around it.

You can drive to the car parks or join the yacht club, but canoeing and kayaking are not allowed, you can fish or watch birds provided you have a license and walk in. Little cycling is allowed on Bristol Water’s land around the Lake, other than on some very popular shared paths close to a car park and picnic area.  Some of the old roads that used to traverse the valley go into the lake or are in the area around the lake and could be converted to a continuous shared path with a minimum of funding.

photo 3 copy 2

One of the linking paths that could be upgraded

Back in 1999 Margaret Wilson had the idea to gain access for the public to be able to walk or cycle around the lake on the old roads around the valley, safely and separated from traffic.

As a result the Chew Valley Recreational Trail  Association (CVRTA) was formed with Bill Blythe as it’s present Chairman and five other local people, one of whom is Margaret Wilson.

The group have made considerable progress.  The project to provide access around the lake was adopted by Bath and North East Somerset Council in 2001 and it has the support of local Parish Councils.  The long westerly section of the lake now has an off road cycle and walking path alongside the busy main road from Chew Stoke towards West Harptree.  Part of the eastern side from the dam towards Bishop Sutton and close to the lakeside, is already a walking route and B&NES have obtained planning permission for a shared path.  It’s just the funding that is missing for that area at present.

Most of the old roads have Bristol Water signs such as “Private Property”, “no cycling”, “no dogs”,”dogs must be kept on leads”, “no public access”.  You get the idea – the public is not welcome and is being denied access to this beautiful landscape.

Notices like this abound on the lakeside

Notices like this abound on the lakeside

No one is suggesting that access is given without a risk assessment and some restrictions to protect the wild life of this Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). However, not only is it totally unreasonable to restrict access, but it is possibly not in accordance with the Bristol Water’s legal requirements to allow access to land under its control.  There is even a notice asking cyclists to dismount in the car park at Woodford Lodge, Bristol Water’s restaurant.

It is here that a key connection between the Sailing Club and Woodford Lodge near Chew Stoke could be made.  This would link existing tarmac roads, by building a connection of just a few hundred metres along an existing private path.

However, this crucial section of the lake in the northwest corner between the sailing club and restaurant and the one at the southern end of the lake need some work to link existing paths that at present are restricted by Bristol Water.

Bill Blythe said:

The company has never welcomed the idea of a trail. As a group of local people we have felt short of “clout” when dealing with the company. We have never achieved a detailed discussion with representatives of the company.  I understand that the company’s unwillingness to have the road to the sailing club used is based on consideration of safety. For all the other roads and areas, protection of the SSSI status is cited.

Many of the roads around the lake could be used, but Bristol Water is reluctant to allow people to mix with the flora and fauna.

I think everyone can understand the need to protect the natural habitats of the animals that live in the area, but this is done very successfully and with great care in many other areas.  In any case many of the paths that could be used are well away from the shores of the lake.

The Chew Valley Trail Association are so frustrated that they have approached the Department of Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) to ask whether Bristol Water have complied with the legal requirements to allow access to land under their control.   In particular the old tarmac roads.

Another member of the group, a retired water engineer with knowledge of the industry and the legislation with regards to access to the land of water companies, has been pursuing the case with DEFRA for over a year now.  It is hoped that the Secretary of State will give a decision by Christmas, after examining submissions from CVRTA and Bristol Water.

Off road path in background across southern part of the lake. In foreground plenty of space for off road path. There are a number of old roads come out at this point, but now cycling or walking on the road is the only option

Off road path in background, an area south of the lake. In the foreground There is plenty of space for an off road path. There are a number of old roads that could be used that come out near this point, but now cycling or walking on the busy  road is the only option

After 14 years it seems that we should soon know whether the Secretary of State has accepted  arguments for more public access or those for continued restriction by Bristol Water.

At Chew Valley Lake with goodwill and care the lake could become a terrific asset for local people to enjoy and to bring visitors to the area .  The best type of visitors too – those who walk and ride bicycles do least damage to the environment, probably spend more money and are mindful of the natural world.

Update:    DEFRA have indeed given a ruling that Bristol Water are not in contravention of a duty under water legislation to make access to their land easier.

Posted in Routes and events | 5 Comments

Two Tunnels Code of Conduct

Inside the Combe Down Tunnel

Inside the Combe Down Tunnel

A draft Code has been put together by Frank Tompson from the Two Tunnels Community Group and Jon Usher of Sustrans.  Please make your comments and suggestions for improvements to the draft  through the comments facility on this web site.  We want to finalise and print the Code as soon as we can.  The draft is shown below.

Code of Conduct

The path offers a great way for walkers, cyclists and the less mobile to get between Bath and Midford and destinations in between. Many young, elderly and disabled people benefit from the path which provides a traffic-free environment to relax and unwind. We all have responsibilities for the safety of others, and if we each follow a few simple rules everyone can enjoy it. 
Mobility scooters may use the path. Motor cycles and horses are prohibited.

SONY DSC

Bridge opening on Two Tunnels Path

All Users
Keep to the left
Leave no litter
Respect the privacy of adjoining properties and landowners

Cyclists
Cyclists tend to be the fastest movers on the path, which is not suitable for high speeds. If you wish to travel quickly or train for fitness this is better done on quiet roads.

  • Take particular care when heading north from Devonshire Tunnel where the path heads downhill and it is easy to pick up excess speed.
  • Give way to pedestrians and wheelchair users;
  • Be courteous and patient with other path users who are moving more slowly than you;
  • Do not startle other people, particularly those who are frail or who have reduced sight, hearing or mobility;
  • In the tunnels the path width reduces; slow down if space is limited or if you cannot see clearly ahead;
  • Be particularly careful at junctions, or any other ‘blind spots’ where people could appear in front of you without warning;
  • Carry a bell and use it to avoid surprising people;
  • However, don’t assume people can see or hear you – remember that some people are hard of hearing or visually impaired;
  • In dull and dark weather make sure you have lights so you can be seen.

Dog Walkers

  • Keep dogs under close control and clear up after your dog

Remember – Share the path so that everyone can enjoy it!

Posted in Cycling around Bath, Uncategorized | 14 Comments

Critical mass cycle in Bath

Riders in Dorchester Street

Riders in near City of Bath College

The first of the new “Critical Mass” rides took place on Friday 27th September, with 15 cyclists, most on their way home from work, starting in Kingsmead Square.  The “mass” was hardly “critical”, with 15 riders mostly on their way home from work.  The short route was along Dorchester Street, over Pulteney Bridge, Bathwick Street, the Paragon, Milsom Street and back to Kingsmead Square via Cheap Street and Westgate Street.

Rides will continue on the last Friday of every month, meeting in Kingsmead Square at 5.30pm. The aim is not to disrupt traffic, which at that time last Friday was practically stationary anyway, but to demonstrate what the future may be like with many more bikes on the road.  If there is a transfer from cars to bikes maybe traffic would not come to a halt as often.  About 85% of cyclists drive cars so there would seem to be scope for more to leave their cars at home and take to two wheels.

Stopped in traffic on Paragon

Stopped in traffic on Paragon

There was only one unpleasant moment when a very impatient x39 bus driver hooted and tried to pass just to get one car’s length further up the queue.  Would she have hooted at a car in front, or was it just because she didn’t want to be held up by people on bikes?

The balance is changing with more and more people riding bikes on our roads, so there has to be an adjustment in the amount of space provided.  It seems that it is this that drivers find difficult to accept.  There needs to be a greater understanding, awareness and tolerance of others from all road users.

Posted in Cycling around Bath | 4 Comments

Chronicle picks up cyclists concerns

Roger on London Road at the cycleway where it is planned to have seven car parking spaces

Roger on London Road at the cycleway where it is planned to have seven car parking spaces

Last week the Bath Chronicle picked up information from Twowheeslgood post (thank you guys) and twitter comments of cyclists about three developments in Bath – London Road, Widcombe/Rossiter Road and Windsor Bridge. In these developments cycling groups feel that British Cycling’s “cycle-proofing” has not been implemented.  Cycle-proofing is defined below and you can watch Chris Boardman’s video on cycle-proofing (only two minutes) in “Bookmarks” under British Cycling video, on right hand side of this page:

British Cycling’s Chris Boardman has recently set out BC’s aim for all new roads and junctions to be “cycle-proofed”.  Cycle-proofing is British Cycling’s term for the practice of ensuring that cycling is designed into all new roads and junctions. The aim of cycle-proofing is to make travelling by bicycle safer, more convenient and a more desirable form of transport. If new road and junction design achieves this then it has been cycle-proofed.

Response from B&NES officers in the Chronicle missed the point in listing some of the considerable capital investment that is going into cycling in B&NES.   What might have been good would be an admission (by a politician) that there is some truth in cyclists’ claims and that cycle-proofing would be implemented in the Widcombe scheme, where the design has not yet been completed, and in all future schemes.

There has been fantastic capital investment from Government and from the Council into cycling recently, but we still have to embed cycling into the everyday workings of the council. Indeed people on foot and on bikes are at the top of B&NES Transport priority list, so why not say so and make sure that highways design and funding backs this policy up?

 

Posted in Cycling around Bath, Cycling policy and politics | Leave a comment

London Road changes make road worse for cyclists

photo copy 2

Present cycle/delivery lane that will go under new proposals. What happens to people on bikes then?

A  £750K project on London Road has not improved the lot of cyclists living in or cycling through the area.  This is the main entry to the city from the east and has long had problems with air quality and congestion, yet when the chance to reduce congestion and pollution by making it easy for people to switch to bikes has come, it has not been taken.  In fact the proposals put forward will make the road a “no go” area for cyclists.

This project has had input from the local community, but people who cycle were not represented.  Details of the scheme, which in other respects is an improvement, can be found here: http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/services/planning-and-building-control/major-projects/london-road-regeneration-project

Below are two comments on the affect the scheme will have on people riding bikes:

Dear Fellow Pedallers

I am co-chair of a local green organisation called Transtion Larkhall. We are trying to promote a safer cycling route along London Road to the city centre.

By chance we discovered an imminent plan to make London Road in vicinity of Snow Hill and Morrisons more pedestrian and car parking friendly and less cyclist friendly.

This ‘Gateway’ plan would involve removal of the present cycle path on the inbound pavement between Walcot Buildings and Clevelan Place junction. It would be replaced by car parking on the pavement.

Although this present cycle path arrangement is of limited value it does offer some alternative to the two narrow and usually
vehicle-packed traffic lanes approaching the risky Cleveland Place junction.

Its removal would make cycling on London Road even more unpleasant and risky than it is at present.

Moreover, it would remove space for a significant section of a more extensive safe cycling route on London Road. Transition Larkhall’s Safe Cycling group has proposed this to B&NES but has, as yet, received no response.

If you cycle on London Road or you care about the welfare of your fellow cyclists, and about encouraging more cycling in Bath, please *object* to these proposals. By emailing: Jessica
Turner Jessica_Turner@bathnes.gov.uk

Nigel Sherwen, Cycling Rights Officer for Bath Cycling Club makes the following comments:

On behalf of the Bath Cycling Club I strongly object to the proposals because they have the potential to make cycling on this road more hazardous and less attractive to cyclists than at present.  The scheme does not meet the Council’s stated aim of encouraging cycling, for all it’s health and environmental benefits it can bring. In fact if implemented in it’s current form it is likely to discourage cycling as a means of transport.  My detailed reasons are as follows:

1. Short lengths of advisory cycle lane have been proposed alongside regular traffic flows, which is far from ideal.  However even worse, the cycle lane comes to an abrupt halt at the pavement build out, to narrow the road ( north side between  Snow Hill House and the Esso Garage).  This means that a cyclist using this lane has to come to a stop and have to wait for a safe gap between vehicles to pull into the flow of traffic, which could be a long time. Alternatively they take their chances and pull out into the traffic flow  where drivers will not be expecting such action.  This increases the risk of collisions between vehicles and cyclists.

2. The scheme does not mention the removal of the cycle lane  near Clevland Bridge  for 7 car spaces.  In Bath City Council’s days this was an actual off road cycle lane.  In the early years of B&NES council, despite protests, it was converted at some £60,000 to a loading bay /cycle lane.  Cyclists are meant to get off and walk on the pavement past parked vehicles.  This is as impractical as it is demeaning in it’s treatment of cycling as mode of transport.. The current scheme even removes that very limited cycling facility in favour of car parking, forcing cyclists into the busy road traffic.

3. London Road is an ideal route for cyclists to travel between Larkhall, Lambridge , Batheaston and Bathford and the centre of Bath  as it is a basically a level route.  The only practical alternative involves steep hills and quite busy roads with considerable car parking so not likely to be attractive to most cyclists or would be cyclists.

4. It is not clear what cycle “refuge” at junction means.  Clearly this area (Cleveland Bridge junction) is very difficult for cyclists to negotiate safely.

The scheme could and should be changed to provide a separated cycle route or routes which should be part of the design. There would appear to be plenty of space, particularly on the south side. Why not move the parking into the road in place of the useless intermittent advisory cycle lane, for example, and create a safe cycle route (3m wide, two-way?) out of the pavement width? The evidence is that it’d benefit the traders as well as encourage more cycling.  There exists a Cycle Forum  with bi monthly meetings between the Council (members and officers and cycling representatives).  Why was this body not consulted over the proposals?

Add the failure on London Road, where a cycle lane is to be removed, to the inadequate consideration given to people cycling in Widcombe (see earlier post) there is a gap in the Council’s provision for cycling. Until we have a Transport Strategy it is unlikely that cycling will be given the priority that it should have, but it may be possible to get some change with a motion to Council.

The Government is leading on cycling provision, it is high time that this Council responded to the call for action by the Prime Minister:

Following our success in the Olympics, the Paralympics and the Tour de France, British cycling is riding high – now we want to see cycling soar. Our athletes have shown they are among the best in the world and we want to build on that, taking our cycling success beyond the arena and onto the roads, starting a cycling revolution which will remove the barriers for a new generation of cyclists.

Nigel Sherwen writing above has suggested a way to cater for people on bikes, but an improvement to London road’s problems of pollution and congestion can only be provided by reducing traffic.

If the present bus lane was extended all the way from the Batheaston roundabout to Cleveland Bridge junction it would provide a safer ride on a bikes and also decrease the time of bus journeys.  It might mean that more buses come into Bath along Henrietta Street and across Pulteney Bridge, but the shorter journey would be very attractive to commuters.

Despite recent developments such as the Two Tunnels, the Odd Down cycle track, the Local Sustainable Transport Fund initiatives and the council’s investment of £500K in cycling infrastructure this year, there is still nothing to prevent cycling being ignored in highway changes or new developments.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Cycling around Bath, Roger's opinions | 6 Comments